Posted by
LL in La on Sunday, October 28, 2007 12:15:13 PM
What's the point talking to flowers? In Lilly's case, the "bulb" suspends above her head instead of buried in the dirt where it really belongs. I'm amazed at one fact in particular: for an administration that is continually typified as the most brain-dead in American history and, on the otherhand, the most diabolically devious masters of intrigue able to pull off flawless escapades under the noses of its own citizens with the cooperation of the Guilliany's of this world, give me a break. Bushophobia is really corrupting what little you have left in that bulb if there was anything there to begin with.
Freedom of speech, Lilly, gives you the right to say anything you want and I support your right to post that here in this forum (as if I had any control over that anyway). Creative thinking and factual reporting, however, are two separate fields and should not be mixed.
So here's the choices: Bush is a dolt and could never have figured out how to accomplish such a college-graduate level project so he couldn't have done it. Or, Bush is the most brilliant man in the world that appoints Michael Brown, Alberto Gonzalez, Donald Rumsfeld, et. al., into his mesmerizing "Fascist" regime and they all go down in flames with endless Congressional inquiries and he successfully bamboozles the Waxman's, the Kennedy's, the Frank's, the Rangle's, the Schumer's, the Clinton's, et. al.--politician's who would give a dangling part of their anatomy (Hillary thinks she has 'em, too!)-to impeach this President--and they ALL mind-numbingly look the other way because they are under the charismatic spell of this American Rasputin we call Dubya.
So there are your choices: (pick one which makes the most sense to you and stick with it) A) Dubya's too dumb B) Dubya's brilliant C) Both A & B
(Answers below)
You can't have it both ways. If you picked A, you fall into the category that would send campaign money to the "Paris for Prez" campaign in about ten years and ask her to nominate Brit as her VP choice because we "really need a woman (or two) in the White House."
If you picked B, your real first name must be Barbara, Laura or Jenna and your last name would be Bush, duh, and you would be guilty of staying with a man the likes of Hitler, Stalin, Polpott, Amin, et. al. who must have had just an iota of charisma to pull their plots off!
If you picked C, your last name must be Moore, Obama, Edwards, Waxman, Feingold, Mahr, Gore--do I need to go on. I think not.
You are welcomed to respond and I would like to hear facts of how A, B, or C accomplished the plot you propose. In detail.