Posted by
LL in La on Sunday, August 30, 2009 12:00:00 AM
"From all our legends, mythology, and history (and who is to know where mythology leaves off and history begins – or which is which), the first radical known to man who rebelled against the establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own kingdom – Lucifer." --Saul Alinsky, Chicago "Community Organizer" Inspiration and Mentor for President Obama from "Rules for Radicals" opening.
While it is within the legal right of every American to exercise his/her free speech and free exchange of ideas, it is likewise incumbent upon the population to weigh those ideas against the source of its wisdom and compare the philosophy of those spoken words with the original intent of the comment(s).
According to "legend," Lucifer set about to destroy or undermine an "allegedly" adequate system because he could do it better. So, while not directly intending to equate the Alinsky/Obama sympathetic connection to antichristal proportions, words do mean things. Books often have inspirational covers but it's the words contained in them that influence change and rebellion.
No matter what one believes or has faith in spiritually, consider the historical fact that a nation of men founded on principles of freedom
and individuality however flawed by human myopic limitations such as slavery and "New Deals", we must ask ourselves which nation in history created the possibility and opportunity for any person to freely (even with occassional stumbles of societal blindness) rise above circumstance to his/her own level of competence? Provided the lawful system of ordinance to protect that assent once the kinks have been tested and smoothed out?
Next, then, we must ask ourselves which system purports to take our imperfect but willful "Eden", lured with the fruit of "equality"--and we recall the Luciferian "promise" of divine inheritance once bitten then consumed--an action irreversible and condemning "Eden" to ruin despite honorable hopes that what we "hear" is equal to what we have based our American dreams on.
Ideologically, the devil is in the details if one reads and compares the US Constitution to Rules for Radicals. One offers everyone the chance to hope and change. The other attempts to curse an impure Eden with a system that has historically and ideologically failed over 6 thousand years of recorded history. The US Constitution is the new attempt at perfection. Rules for Radicals is the "change" promised but never realized by--as Mr. Alinsky attributed to--Lucifer. I didn't say that; he did freely.
So which among us puts stock in Luciferian methodology to achieve the ends since means are irrelevant? Alinsky, Ayers, Wright, et. al. No "Devil" (capital "D") granted in those personages or in the White House. "Lucifer" portends to being "of the light". And sometimes the brilliance of that light shined directly in your eyes can temporarily--and temporally--blind you to truth. That's Lucifer's means to his ends.